News Journal: Number 09, August 9, 2010: President Obama’s Big Arrogant Despicable (BAD) Lie On Immigration and Enforcement Of Immigration Laws–Back Door Amnesty For Illegal Aliens!–Aiding, Abetting and Promoting Crime In America–Obama Visits Two Sanctuary Cities–Austin and Dallas Texas!
In 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the Immigration Reform and Control Act.
The bill granted amnesty to about 3 million illegal aliens, mostly from Mexico.
“It’s high time we regained control of our borders and his bill will do this.”
~President Ronald Reagan
“If you grant amnesty, the message that you’re sending is that if you come in this country and stay here long enough, we will let you stay. And no one will ever come through the legal process if you do that.”
~Marc Rubio, Florida Republican Senate candidate
“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free .”
~Ronald Reagan
Immigration Excerpt from President Obama’s Interview on the CBS Early Show
Obama’s Backdoor Amnesty Plan?
Here comes Backdoor Amnesty ,To Bypass Congress , Gibbs Lied !!!
Obama’s Scheme to Provide Backdoor Amnesty in the Works
Gov’t Memo Proposes Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants
Amnesty Plan in the Works?
All Presidents of the United States take the following oath of office in accordance with Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
One of the primary responsibilities of the United States government is to protect each of the states against invasion:
U.S. Constitution, Article 4, Section 4
Section 4 – Republican government
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A4Sec4
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
While nobody knows the exact number of illegal immigrants in the United States, past estimates have ranged from a low of 10 million to over 30 million illegal aliens living and working in the United States.
The United States population in 2010 is about 310 million including illegal immigrants.
Thus illegal immigrants represents between a minimum of 3.3% to over 10% of the United States population.
However, illegal immigrants tend to live and work in and around so-called sanctuary cities.
Sanctuary cities do not permit their police departments and other municipal employees to enforce Federal immigration laws by asking illegal immigrants any questions regarding their immigration status.
Below is a map of just some of the United States largest sanctuary cities:
For a more detailed and inclusive state by state map go to this web page:
SANCTUARY CITIES AND STATES ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT INFORMATION RESOURCE
http://www.sanctuarycities.info/
The two major sources of illegal aliens in the United States are those who entered the United States legally with a visa and then over stayed their visas and those crossing into the United States from Mexico, primarily Mexicans and those from other Latin American countries.
For the last twenty years the United States has been invaded by millions of illegal aliens crossing from Mexico into the United States illegally.
Thousands are entering the United States each day by crossing from Mexico.
The Mexican government is actually encouraging their citizens to go to United States and work.
If this is not an invasion, then what is?
The Federal Government under both Republican and Democratic administrations have simply refused to vigorously enforce existing Federal immigration laws for political reasons.
Both Presidents Bush and Obama have failed to honor their oath of office and enforce existing immigration laws.
Why?
The Republican Party wants the financial campaign contributions from businesses that benefit from hiring illegal immigrants.
The Democratic Party also wants the financial campaign contributions from these businesses as well as unions but also the votes of illegal immigrants once a “pathway to citizenship” or amnesty for illegal aliens is passed into law.
Both political parties and the ruling political elites are ignoring the will and sovereignty of the American people who want Federal immigration law enforcement.
The American people want the removal from the workplace of all illegal aliens and their deportation to their country origin.
There are currently over 30 million American citizens looking for full-time employment in the United States.
This is more than twice the 13 million Americans who were looking for work during the worse months of the Great Depression.
There are currently between 10 million and 15 million illegal aliens working in the United States.
Again, nobody knows the exact number.
If the current immigration laws were vigorously enforced and the illegal aliens deported, many of these 10 million to 15 million jobs would require the hiring of currently unemployed American citizens by employers.
President Obama, knowing he is acting like a demigod,would rather accuse those who are insisting that the Federal government enforce immigration laws–as being demigods themselves.
This is a classic example of psychological projection.
Projection, Part 1
Americans are not anti-immigration.
Americans favor controlled limited legal immigration.
Americans oppose uncontrolled unlimited illegal immigration.
The distinction between legal and illegal immigration is one that President Obama never mentions.
The reason is quite clear, President Obama wants all immigrants, legal and illegal to become United States citizens.
Americans are for the rule of law and the enforcement of the law.
The President knows this and so do the American people.
The President completely misrepresents what is actually occurring by not making the critical and important distinction between legal and illegal immigration.
The American people oppose illegal immigration by margins of 3 and 4 to 1.
A big arrogant despicable lie by a President of the United States is broadcast to millions of Americans.
This is done while his own Administration plots to undermine consensual representative government in the United States by seriously considering an executive order to grant amnesty to million of illegal aliens.
The President knows that local, city, county or state government and their police forces cannot deport any one that is arrested or detained.
Instead the detainees must be turned over to the Federal government for deportation.
This leaves a record of how many were turned over to the Federal government and how many were eventually deported.
This is a record that the Federal government apparently does not want to create and report to the American people.
Instead, Obama’s Department of Justice challenges any and every state that seriously enforces Federal immigration laws.
Hence the challenge to Arizona’s new law pertaining to immigration law enforcement which mirrors the Federal government’s immigration laws.
Arizona Ruling an Abomination
The American people only want the enforcement of immigration laws by the Federal government.
The Federal government under both Presidents Bush and Obama simply would not vigorously enforce these laws for essentially political reasons.
Instead both Presidents wanted comprehensive immigration reform which at its core is simply amnesty for illegal immigrants.
Both Presidents are substituting the rule of the few for the rule of law.
The American people will not let this tyranny of the ruling elites in Washington D.C. stand.
First the Republicans were turned out in 2006 and 2008 and this November and in 2012 the Democrats will be turned out of office.
President Obama uses strawman arguments and projection to accuse others of what President Obama is actually doing, refusing to vigorously enforce immigration laws and refusing to deport millions of illegal aliens.
The American people want results not a summary of how many resources the President has sent to the American/Mexican borders.
The American people are not so easily fooled or intimidated.
Arizona Should Sue the Department of Justice…
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Bounty…
When Mexican drug dealers put a bounty on an Arizona sheriff for enforcing immigration laws, one begins to wonder why are these drug dealers are on the same side of the argument as President Obama and not the American people.
Whose side is Barack Obama on anyway?
The American people or the criminals?
Americans are beginning to wonder out loud.
Illegal immigrants are not undocumented immigrants–they are illegal aliens or more precisely criminal aliens.
They are criminal aliens who have broken several U.S. laws.
First, illegal aliens enter the United States illegally–crime number 1.
Second, they purchase fraudulent identification documents that they use to obtain employment–crime number 2.
Third, they work for businesses or organizations in the United States–crime number 3.
Fourth, the businesses and organizations who employ them are aiding and abetting criminal activity–crime number 4.
Criminal aliens should be arrested, tried and if found guilty, deported to their country of origin.
The majority of the American people simply want the illegal aliens to go home on their own accord–self-deport.
The roads in America run in both directions.
If you are here illegally, please just leave.
The majority of the American people want enforcement of existing immigration laws.
The majority of the American people oppose amnesty for illegal aliens and a “pathway to citizenship”–you do not reward criminals, you punish them.
The majority of the American people oppose sanctuary cities.
Sanctuary cities are those who refuse to allow their own police to enforce Federal immigration laws which the cities are required to do by Federal law.
Sanctuary cities include Washington, D.C., Chicago, Boston, New York City, Philadelphia, Miami, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Houston and Dallas to name just a few.
These are cities who refuse to enforce Federal immigration laws and are therefore aiding and abetting criminal activity!
Every day millions of American citizens are unemployed, while millions of criminal aliens are working for employers who benefit from the hiring of illegal aliens.
For example I am writing this post in the sanctuary city of Dallas.
I attended a local community college who in the last ten years constructed two new buildings on its campus.
These buildings were constructed largely by illegal aliens or criminal aliens from Mexico who worked for considerably less money than American construction workers.
Today, these two new buildings and the remaining buildings on campus are cleaned by a janitorial staff consisting mainly of illegal aliens–Mexicans.
The campus police were and are well aware that these workers were and are illegal aliens but did absolutely nothing about it.
Dallas is a sanctuary city or more accurately a criminal city that actively discourages its police officers from enforcing Federal immigration laws by asking any questions about immigration status.
This same situation is repeated in hundreds of towns and cities across the United States daily.
Both Presidents George Bush and Barack Obama broke their oaths of office by refusing to vigorously enforce current immigration laws.
Both were corrupted by power and arrogantly thought that they knew best what was good for the American people.
Instead both Presidents sought comprehensive immigration reform, a code word for amnesty for illegal immigration, despite the opposition of the majority of the American people to illegal immigration and amnesty for illegal immigrants.
Who got hurt?
Take the preceding example of the community college.
American citizens should have been hired to construct the two buildings and to clean them once they were built.
These are jobs Americans have done in the past and today still do despite the repeated lies of the American ruling class that these are jobs that Americans will not do–give me a break.
Yes the ruling political elites may not do a job that an illegal alien does, but believe it or not there are millions of hard-working Americans who have in the past and will today do them to earn a living instead of becoming dependent upon the Government for handouts and welfare.
Multiple this by the millions of jobs across the United States over many years and you begin to see the problem.
The ruling political elites of both political parties simply do not give a damn that the American people are demanding–enforcement of existing immigration laws.
Particularly hurt are young hispanic and black Americans where the unemployment rates are extremely high:
Standing up for Jobless Hispanic Americans
HISPANIC AMERICANS STAND AGAINST ILLEGAL ALIENS !!!
The ruling political elites only care about power and staying in office.
Vote these professional politicians of both parties out of power.
Start by voting out of office those in your city, county, school, college, and state government that are aiding and abetting criminal aliens by employing them.
If they are for comprehensive immigration reform or amnesty and open borders, just vote them out of office.
The job you save just might be your own.
Sanctuary Cities Getting Free Pass?
54% Favor Justice Department Action Against Sanctuary Cities
“…Fifty-four percent (54%) of U.S. voters say the Justice Department should take legal action against cities that provide sanctuary for illegal immigrants. Even more think the federal government should cut off funds to these “sanctuary cities.”
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 30% say the federal government should not take legal action against cities that offer illegal immigrants various forms of sanctuary. Fifteen percent (15%) more are not sure.
The findings are in sharp contrast to voter attitudes about the Justice Department’s decision to challenge a new law in Arizona that attempts to help enforce federal immigration law. Fifty-six percent (56%) oppose the Justice Department’s decision to challenge the legality of Arizona’s new immigration law in federal court. Sixty-one percent (61%), in fact, favor passage of a law like Arizona’s in their own state. …”
Today, President Obama is in Dallas and Austin Texas, two of the many sanctuary cities that refuse to enforce Federal immigration laws.
Has the Department of Justice ever sued any of the so-called sanctuary cities for their failure to enforce the law–no they have not!
Texas Sanctuary Cities
TEXAS HAS ONE OR MORE CITIES OFFERING
ILLEGAL SANCTUARY
Austin, Texas
Baytown, Texas
Brownsville, Texas
Channelview, Texas
Denton, Texas
Dallas, Texas
El Cenizo, Texas
Forth Worth, Texas
Houston, Texas
Katy, Texas
Laredo, Texas
League City, Texas
McAllen, Texas
Port Arthur, Texas
San Antonio, Texas
http://www.sanctuarycities.info/sanctuary_state_texas.htm
Sanctuary Cities – Has the government ever sued them?
Questioning of Arizona Attorney General and ICE Official at Homeland Security Hearing
Mark Levin – Obama To Back Door Amnesty For Illegal Immigrants
Alex Jones: Obama Threatening To Pass “Immigration Reform” By Executive Order
Obama Takes Sides With Illegal Alien Invaders AGAINST Americans!
A Video Fisking of President Obama’s Immigration Speech
Virginia targets illegal immigrants
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NS6OsWfXJvM
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”
~Samuel Adams
Background Articles and Videos
Desert Invasion – U.S.
Illegal immigration invasion numbers analysis by Fred Elbel
“…The idea for the following analysis is based upon the article titled Could There Be Twenty Million Illegals In The U.S.?”, by D.A. King, THE AMERICAN RESISTANCE FOUNDATION, published on VDARE, August 7, 2004.20 The purpose of this analysis is to present illegal immigration numbers that are more realistic than numbers being presented by the federal government – the very entity responsible for the tidal wave of illegal aliens entering our nation.
This analysis demonstrates that the December, 2003 Department of Homeland Security estimates of 8 million to 12 million illegal aliens in the United States and 700,000 new illegals entering and staying per year represent significant undercounts. This analysis shows that it is reasonable to state that at least 20 million illegal aliens reside in the United States and that up to 12,000 illegal aliens enter the United States every day, or, as Arizona Senator John McCain reports – more than 4 million per year.
This analysis also demonstrates that the proposed White House “guest worker” amnesty proposal of January, 2004 resulted in at least a 25 percent increase in the number of illegal aliens entering into the United States.
The precise number of illegals entering the United States and the exact rate at which they cross our borders is unknown. Official government numbers are often hard to come by and are routinely sanitized. The estimate of the number of illegals who enter depends on Border Patrol apprehension rates and estimates of the number that “got away”. The following sections presents a methodology to estimating the number of illegals and the impact of amnesty proposals on illegal immigration numbers. …”
“…Conclusion
Intentionally low, static, and misleading official government estimates claim that 8 million to 12 million illegal aliens reside in the United States and that 700,000 new illegals enter and stay every year. Based upon the analysis presented here, it is likely that in mid-2005 more than 20 million illegal aliens presently resided in the United States, with roughly 12,000 additional illegal aliens entering every day.
No one can say with certainty how many illegal aliens enter and reside in the United States because the precise data simply are not available. The methodology used in this analysis is presented as an alternative approach to estimating illegal alien numbers. Because it depends on factors that are not known with great accuracy, it produces a wider range of estimates than traditional estimates, but can be used to present another perspective on illegal immigration numbers.
Further analysis is certainly warranted. However it is important to recognize the magnitude of the numbers in order to recognize the seriousness of the crisis and urgency for a return to the rule of law and secured borders that the United States Constitution demands.
http://www.desertinvasion.us/data/invasion_numbers.html#conclusion
NO PAROLE OR DEFERRED ACTION FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS, HATCH, 7 OTHERS TELL OBAMA
“…In their letter to the president, Hatch and the other senators wrote that the Obama administration’s immigration policy should not be misused to usurp Congress’ authority.
“While deferred action and parole are Executive Branch authorities, they should not be used to circumvent Congress’ constitutional authority to legislate immigration policy, particularly as it relates to the illegal population in the United States,” the senators wrote.
Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga.; David Vitter, R-La.; Jim Bunning, R-Ky.; James Inhofe, R-Okla.; Thad Cochran, R-Miss.; and Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., also signed the letter to the president.
A copy of the letter to the president is attached and follows:
June 21, 2010
President Barack H. Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear President Obama:
We understand that there’s a push for your Administration to develop a plan to unilaterally extend either deferred action or parole to millions of illegal aliens in the United States. We understand that the Administration may include aliens who have willfully overstayed their visas or filed for benefits knowing that they will not be eligible for a status for years to come. We understand that deferred action and parole are discretionary actions reserved for individual cases that present unusual, emergent or humanitarian circumstances. Deferred action and parole were not intended to be used to confer a status or offer protection to large groups of illegal aliens, even if the agency claims that they look at each case on a “case-by-case” basis.
While we agree our immigration laws need to be fixed, we are deeply concerned about the potential expansion of deferred action or parole for a large illegal alien population. While deferred action and parole are Executive Branch authorities, they should not be used to circumvent Congress’ constitutional authority to legislate immigration policy, particularly as it relates to the illegal population in the United States.
The Administration would be wise to abandon any plans for deferred action or parole for the illegal population. Such a move would further erode the American public’s confidence in the federal government and its commitment to securing the borders and enforcing the laws already on the books.
We would appreciate receiving a commitment that the Administration has no plans to use either authority to change the current position of a large group of illegal aliens already in the United States, and ask that you respond to us about this matter as soon as possible. …”
Examiner Editorial: White House provides back-door amnesty
Examiner Editorial
August 2, 2010
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/White-House-provides-a-back-door-to-amnesty-1006426-99725574.html#ixzz0w9JfGWRZ
“…The memo sheds light on why the Justice Department finds Arizona’s immigration law so odious. The law, popularly passed by the state Legislature and signed into law by the governor, is an effort to address the flow of illegal immigrants into the state by allowing Arizona police officers to detain illegal immigrants. But the police are not empowered to deport the illegals — instead, the detainees are referred to the federal government. This would create a record of the illegal immigrants the administration refuses to deport, making transparent the White House’s efforts to undermine current immigration law.
The memo is clear on this point: The federal government can use “deferred action” at its discretion in halting a deportation indefinitely (usually for a humanitarian reason). “This would permit individuals for whom relief may become available in the future to live and work in the U.S. without fear of removal.” But to do so would require justification and a paper trail, two things the administration has worked hard to avoid. The memo reveals as much: “While it is theoretically possible to grant deferred action to an unrestricted number of unlawfully present individuals, doing so would likely be controversial, not to mention expensive.” It’s controversial because it would attract attention, unlike other stealth measures proposed in the memo that could be implemented without alerting the public — such as expanding the definition of “extreme hardship,” which would enable virtually any illegal immigrant to qualify for an exemption from deportation.
There is one bright side to this scandal. If politicians continue to ignore the democratic process and the voters, the voters will use the democratic process to have their say in November.
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/White-House-provides-a-back-door-to-amnesty-1006426-99725574.html#ixzz0w9JHgpZY
Nationally, 60% Favor Letting Local Police Stop and Verify Immigration Status
“…Arizona Governor Jan Brewer last week signed a new law into effect that authorizes local police to stop and verify the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being an illegal immigrant. A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds that 60% of voters nationwide favor such a law, while 31% are opposed.
Seventy-seven percent (77%) of Republicans support the law along with 62% of voters not affiliated with either major party. Democratic voters are evenly divided on the measure.
At the same time, however, 58% of all voters are at least somewhat concerned that “efforts to identify and deport illegal immigrants will also end up violating the civil rights of some U.S. citizens.” That figure includes 29% who are Very Concerned about possible civil rights violations.
Voter support for empowering local police comes at a time when most voters (56%) believe it is unlikely Congress will take action to gain control of the border. Only 31% say Congress is even somewhat likely to take such an action. That figure includes just 10% who believe Congress is Very Likely to act. …”
Pronk Papers 